Subscribe-to-CVN-Blog-Graphic-small.png

Recent Georgia Railroad Injury Case Highlights Differences between Georgia and Federal Law

Posted by Steve Silver on May 6, 2015 5:37:56 PM

 


Atlanta—As Fulton County Superior Court Judge Alford Dempsey read the verdict in the recent case of Winfred Evans v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Professional Transportation, Inc. (2012CV223527), one item of damages was somewhat unusual. The jury awarded damages against both defendants for past and future lost earnings of plaintiff Winfred Evans, but the amount awarded against Professional Transportation, Inc. (PTI), was larger than the amount awarded against Norfolk Southern Railway Company. The differing damage awards illustrated one of the differences between trying a case under Georgia tort law and under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq.

Read More

Topics: Negligence, Georgia, Evans v. Norfolk Southern Railway

Elite Defense Attorney Featured on Engle Trading Card Tuesday | Series 3, Card 2

Posted by Courtroom View Network on May 5, 2015 6:04:00 PM

Today's CVN Engle progeny trading card features one of the leading defense attorneys in Florida's landmark litigation. 

Read More

Topics: Negligence, Products Liability, tobacco, Engle Litigation Trading Cards, Engle Progeny, Florida

Top Hospital Faces Trial After Intestine Connected To Vagina

Posted by David Siegel on May 5, 2015 5:45:00 PM

Durham  One of the country’s most elite hospitals, Duke University Medical Center, was accused of malpractice in a North Carolina courtroom on Tuesday by an attorney for a woman whose intestine was accidentally reconnected to her vagina instead of her rectum following bowel surgery.

Read More

Topics: Malpractice, healthcare, north carolina

Sheldon Adelson Clashes With Judge During Pretrial Testimony

Posted by David Siegel on May 4, 2015 5:24:00 PM

Read More

Topics: Nevada

In Closings of $3M Med-Mal Trial, Attorney Says Circumstantial Proof Is Strong | Florida Trial Video

Posted by Courtroom View Network on May 2, 2015 12:49:00 PM

 

It can be difficult to effectively argue the value of circumstantial evidence to jurors accustomed to television courtroom dramas that contain "smoking-gun" direct evidence in a case. However, during closings of Araujo v. Eisner, Morgan & Morgan's John Dill uses a "rainy day" analogy to argue the strength of the circumstantial evidence at issue in his medical malpractice case. 

Read More

Topics: Negligence, Medical Malpractice, Florida, araujo v. eisner, Video Highlight