Frank Bayuk and Bethany Schneider discuss their approach to potential case weaknesses, and how they won a $7 million verdict in a Yamaha rollover crash trial. Watch the full interview, as well as openings in the trial, here. 

Adeptly addressing potential weaknesses in your case is critical to persuading a jury at trial. And in a wide-ranging interview breaking down how they won a $7 million verdict against Yamaha for the injuries a toddler suffered in a golf car rollover crash, Bayuk & Pratt’s Frank Bayuk and Schneider Injury Law’s Bethany Schneider discussed how they masterfully undercut a major potential weakness in their case.

Courtroom View Network is excited to launch our annual ‘Summer Special’ discount offer, which gives even more affordable access to the world’s only video library of civil jury trials featuring the top plaintiff and defense attorneys in the country in action in front of real juries in real courtrooms.

Stock image. 

Decatur, GA— Jurors in Georgia last week cleared an ambulance company of responsibility for the death of a woman its paramedic treated following her fall from a second-story apartment window. Wright v. Metro Ambulance Services, Inc., 21A01147. 

Lawrenceville, GA— Jurors Wednesday awarded $28 million at trial over the death of a Georgia man in a head-on crash. Cohen, et al. v. Bell, 23-C-00222-S2. 

Arguing non-economic damages such as pain and suffering in a case that involves a serious, but not necessarily catastrophic injury can be difficult. Framing the injury so that jurors understand its severity while ensuring jurors don’t feel that the loss has been exaggerated is key to setting up the best possible award. And in the latest Trial Technique Spotlight, Shane Read, one of the country’s preeminent trial consultants, spotlights how Bethany Schneider powerfully framed a non-catastrophic traumatic brain injury to set up a $5.5 million total verdict.