Where multiple cars contribute to a crash, a “John Doe” driver that’s not party to a case makes an easy target for a defendant at trial to push blame to, and can be a difficult obstacle when arguing liability as a plaintiff’s attorney. In a trial over the back injuries an Atlanta-area architect claims were caused by the driver that rear-ended him, Mike Goldberg pulls from his own past to drive home the issue of defendant’s responsibility. Reboulet v. Schlosberg.
Courtroom View Network
Recent Posts
Watch Michael Goldberg's Closing At Trial Over Spinal Damage Following Cobb County Car Crash |VIDEO|
Posted by Courtroom View Network on Nov 10, 2016 5:21:18 PM
Topics: Court Video, Negligence, Georgia, Transportation, Reboulet v. Schlosberg
Share of Women Among New Partners in BigLaw Hits Five-Year High: Report
Posted by Courtroom View Network on Nov 3, 2016 4:19:05 PM
Stock photo.
The share of women among new partners at the nation’s largest legal firms hit a five-year high, according to a report by the Diversity & Flexibility Alliance.
Topics: News
$11M Verdict for Consultant After Trial Against Empty Chairs: The Trial Wire
Posted by Courtroom View Network on Oct 31, 2016 5:07:03 PM
Stock photo.
With The Trial Wire, CVN moves beyond news of trials it webcasts to share the best stories of other significant litigation across the country.
A metro Atlanta political consultant’s $11-plus million verdict against two men he claimed destroyed his reputation may be an incomplete victory, given questions of improper service on one of the men and the fact that neither defendant showed for trial, leaving an empty defense table facing jurors, according to a story in the Atlanta Journal Constitution.
Evidence Rules May Be the $127M - and Counting - Difference Between Missouri and New Jersey Talc-Cancer Cases: Report
Posted by Courtroom View Network on Oct 20, 2016 11:54:22 AM
Stock photo.
Missouri juries have awarded $127 million in state talc-cancer cases this year, with more potentially to come, while New Jersey, a hotbed of talc-cancer litigation itself, recently threw out two similar cases. Why the disparity? According to a legal expert interviewed in a recent Forbes article, it may be fundamental differences in expert witness admissibility.
Topics: product liability, Missouri
Update: $9.1M Verdict, Including $3M in Punitives, Hits Tobacco Cos. for Smoker's Death
Posted by Courtroom View Network on Sep 22, 2016 9:42:52 PM
Topics: Negligence, Products Liability, tobacco, engle, Florida, Oshinsky-Blacker v. R.J. Reynolds