0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Topics: Medical Malpractice, healthcare, Nevada
Arguing damages stemming solely from non-economic loss can be difficult: A jury has no hard set of numbers to use as a starting point in calculating an award, while surviving plaintiffs' ability to cope following an incident can be used as an argument to mitigate non-economic loss. However, in closings of a 2019 damages-only trial over the death of a Florida mother hours after childbirth, Todd Michaels secured an eight-figure win by upending a defense contention on non-economic loss.
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Topics: Medical Malpractice, Florida, vargas-chavez v. gonzalez-garcia, et al.
Bradley Beckworth in closings of a landmark trial trial against Johnson & Johnson over its alleged role in Oklahoma's opioid crisis. It's just one of several blockbuster trials CVN has added to its library recently. You can see this trial, and hundreds of others, gavel-to-gavel, with a CVN subscription.
Over the past few weeks, CVN has added an array of blockbuster trials to our unsurpassed courtroom video library. The newest additions include major verdicts in two traumatic brain injury trials, a landmark opioid judgment, and a pair of big defense wins in medical malpractice and premises liability cases.
Among the most interesting trials we’ve recently added:
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Topics: Premises Liability, Medical Malpractice, Florida, Georgia, Traumatic Brain Injury, Izundu v. Choi, et al., Spencer-Smith v. Cafe 290, State of Oklahoma v. Purdue Pharma, et al.
A prospective juror that expresses strong opinions on issues adverse to a case can be a critical landmine during voir dire. Such opinions risk swaying other members of the venire. However, during jury selection in a 2018 medical malpractice case, Nick Rowley upended a prospective juror’s pro-tort reform stance when introducing his damages claim.
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Topics: Medical Malpractice, Washington, Driscoll v. Harrison Medical Center, et al.
Stock image.
Atlanta— Jurors Thursday cleared an Atlanta neurologist of fault in a $10 million claim over a condition that left one of his patients legally blind. Izundu v. Choi, et al., 16EV003151.
0 Comments Click here to read/write comments
Topics: Medical Malpractice, Georgia, Izundu v. Choi, et al.
