Subscribe-to-CVN-Blog-Graphic-small.png

msch

Recent Posts

Piendle Phase 2 Closing Arguments

Posted by msch on Aug 18, 2010 7:32:00 PM

"Today we're here to decide how much -- how much -- these defendants should be punished," Searcy Denney's Greg Barnhart told the jury in closing the punitive damages phase of Piendle v. R.J. Reynolds.

Read More

Topics: Toxic Torts, Products Liability, Engle Progeny, Tobacco Litigation, Piendle v. RJ Reynolds

Budnick v. Reynolds Opening Statements

Posted by msch on Aug 18, 2010 11:58:00 AM

Opening statements began today in the Engle-progeny tobacco trial Budnick v. R.J. Reynolds, webcast live by CVN.

Read More

Topics: Toxic Torts, Products Liability, Budnick v. Reynolds, Engle Progeny, Tobacco Litigation

Piendle Punitive Damages Phase Begins

Posted by msch on Aug 16, 2010 7:10:00 PM

At the start of the punitive damages phase, the Piendle v. R.J. Reynolds jury heard from former tobacco CEO Robert Heimann by video from a deposition taken in December, 1986. Mr. Heimann testified as to American Tobacco Company's conclusion that cigarettes were not injurious to health, and as to the research underlying this conclusion. Mr. Heimann testified that the surgeon general was "dead wrong" in concluding that cigarette smoking causes lung cancer, and that a long list of health organizations denouncing cigarette smoking as hazardous were all wrong, even though he could not name any organization that had concluded otherwise. 

Read More

Topics: Products Liability, Engle Progeny, Tobacco Litigation, Piendle v. RJ Reynolds

Tenants Win in Pierre v. Cox Oakland Rent Control Trial

Posted by msch on Aug 12, 2010 11:20:00 AM

UPDATE (April 12, 2011): 
On December 16, 2010, the Court entered Judgment in this case in favor of Plaintiffs in the amount of $538,963.98.  This is three times the jury verdict, and reflects the provision in Measure EE which requires that a tenant recover treble damages for all harms caused by a landlord’s knowing or reckless violation of the Ordinance.  The jury specifically found that the defendant had wrongfully endeavored to recover each Plaintiff’s unit, and that he did so “in knowing violation of Ordinance.”

On February 18, 2011, the Court awarded to Plaintiffs an additional $1,052,402.00 for attorneys fees in connection with the case, under provisions in Measure EE which provide for attorney fees to prevailing litigants.  Additional motions requesting fees and costs are still pending, and Plaintiffs expect to recover about an additional $70,000 pursuant to those motions. 

Read More

Topics: Real Estate, Pierre v. Cox

Damages Awarded in Andersen v. Kritikos Construction Trial

Posted by msch on Aug 10, 2010 3:01:00 PM

The jury in Andersen Builders v. Kritikos found contract breaches by Andersen, Mr. Kritikos, and Arcs Construction Services.

Read More

Topics: Andersen v. Kritikos, Construction