Stock image. 

Lawrenceville, GA— Jurors Thursday handed down a $16.2 million verdict at trial against Amazon Logistics and a service partner over the injuries a Georgia child suffered when he was run over by a delivery van. Bradfield v. Amazon Logistics, et al., 22-C-07003-S7. 

Stock image. 

Lawrenceville, GA— Jurors Monday previewed evidence surrounding a 2022 Amazon delivery van collision that severely injured a Georgia child, as trial opened against Amazon Logistics and its delivery partner. Bradfield v. Amazon Logistics, et al., 22-C-07003-S7.

Stock image. 

Sometimes the most powerful points in closing arguments come not from statements prepared well in advance, but from rhetorical counterpunches to what opposing counsel just said. In a recent, special edition of Trial Technique Spotlight, noted trial consultant Shane Read details how Arash Homampour’s blistering response to opposing counsel's closing argument helped set up a $36-million-plus award for a fatal motorcycle crash.

Frank Bayuk and Bethany Schneider discuss their approach to potential case weaknesses, and how they won a $7 million verdict in a Yamaha rollover crash trial. Watch the full interview, as well as openings in the trial, here. 

Adeptly addressing potential weaknesses in your case is critical to persuading a jury at trial. And in a wide-ranging interview breaking down how they won a $7 million verdict against Yamaha for the injuries a toddler suffered in a golf car rollover crash, Bayuk & Pratt’s Frank Bayuk and Schneider Injury Law’s Bethany Schneider discussed how they masterfully undercut a major potential weakness in their case.