Subscribe-to-CVN-Blog-Graphic-small.png

|VIDEO| Two Key Issues That Led to $16.2M Verdict in Amazon Delivery Van Crash Trial - New CVN Playlists

Posted by Arlin Crisco on Aug 26, 2024 1:18:47 PM

In openings at trial against Amazon Logistics and a delivery partner over a delivery van crash that injured a child, Michael Goldberg tells jurors that Amazon "control" over the partner equals responsibility as an employer. Subscribers, click here to see a playlist on the issue. 


Earlier this month, a Georgia jury handed down a $16.2 million verdict at trial against Amazon Logistics for the injuries a child suffered in a collision with a delivery van. The proceeding is believed to be among the first in the nation to address the company's potential liability as an employer for the conduct of its delivery partners' drivers. And now CVN subscribers can watch editor-curated trial video breaking out two key issues in the case — employment relationship and negligent training — newly added to our playlist library.

Read More

Topics: Bradfield, et al. v. Amazon Logistics, et al.

$16.2M Verdict Wraps Trial Against Amazon Logistics Over Delivery Van Crash That Injured Child

Posted by Arlin Crisco on Aug 19, 2024 4:50:45 PM

Stock image. 


Lawrenceville, GA— Jurors Thursday handed down a $16.2 million verdict at trial against Amazon Logistics and a service partner over the injuries a Georgia child suffered when he was run over by a delivery van. Bradfield v. Amazon Logistics, et al., 22-C-07003-S7. 

Read More

Topics: Georgia, Bradfield, et al. v. Amazon Logistics, et al.

$25M Crash Trial Opens Against Amazon Logistics & Delivery Partner

Posted by Arlin Crisco on Aug 13, 2024 1:22:30 PM

Stock image. 


Lawrenceville, GA— Jurors Monday previewed evidence surrounding a 2022 Amazon delivery van collision that severely injured a Georgia child, as trial opened against Amazon Logistics and its delivery partner. Bradfield v. Amazon Logistics, et al., 22-C-07003-S7.

Read More

Topics: Georgia, Transportation, Bradfield, et al. v. Amazon Logistics, et al.