Jury Delivers Win For Johnson & Johnson At $5B+ Talc Powder Trial
Posted by David Siegel on Jan 2, 2020 8:32:23 AM
Topics: Products Liability, Missouri, Talc, forrest v. johnson & johnson
BREAKING UPDATE: $4.69 Billion Verdict Pounds Johnson & Johnson in 22-Plaintiff, Talc-Cancer Trial
Posted by Arlin Crisco on Jul 12, 2018 4:23:02 PM
Stock image.
Editor's Note: This story has been updated to reflect a $4.14 billion punitive verdict in the case.
This is a developing story, and updates will be added as events warrant.
St. Louis—Jurors Thursday slammed Johnson & Johnson with a $4.69 billion verdict, including more than $4.1 billion in punitives, for the role they concluded the company played in the ovarian cancer 22 women developed after years of using its talc-based products. Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson, 1522-CC10417.
Topics: Products Liability, Asbestos, Missouri, Talc, Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson
BREAKING: Johnson & Johnson Cleared in Talcum Powder-Cancer Trial
Posted by Arlin Crisco on Mar 3, 2017 7:43:48 PM
Bart Williams delivers his closing argument for Johnson & Johnson.
St. Louis—Jurors cleared Johnson & Johnson and its talc supplier Friday afternoon of responsibility for the ovarian cancer a woman claims was caused by years of using the consumer giant’s baby powder products. Swann v. Johnson & Johnson, 1422-CC09326-01.
Topics: Products Liability, Missouri, Swann v. Johnson & Johnson, Talc
Plaintiff Experts Endure Withering Cross-Examination By Johnson & Johnson As Talc Powder Trial Continues
Posted by David Siegel on Feb 24, 2017 10:24:34 AM
Topics: Products Liability, Missouri, Talc
Evidence Rules May Be the $127M - and Counting - Difference Between Missouri and New Jersey Talc-Cancer Cases: Report
Posted by Courtroom View Network on Oct 20, 2016 11:54:22 AM
Stock photo.
Missouri juries have awarded $127 million in state talc-cancer cases this year, with more potentially to come, while New Jersey, a hotbed of talc-cancer litigation itself, recently threw out two similar cases. Why the disparity? According to a legal expert interviewed in a recent Forbes article, it may be fundamental differences in expert witness admissibility.
Topics: product liability, Missouri