Subscribe-to-CVN-Blog-Graphic-small.png

Walmart Wrongful Death Trial Begins

Posted by msch on Jan 31, 2011 11:44:00 AM

Smith v. Walmart involves a claim that Walmart and its courtesy patrol service, Wackenhut, failed to provide adequate security for the parking lot in which a Walmart customer, Michael Born, was murdered during a robbery.

Read More

Topics: Smith v. Walmart, Negligence, Real Estate

Florida Gas Wins $82M in Pipeline Dispute

Posted by msch on Jan 27, 2011 11:39:00 AM

The jury in Florida Gas Transmission v. Florida Department of Transportation today awarded over $82M in damages against the Florida DOT for breaching an agreement to reimburse for the costs of relocating a gas pipeline.

Read More

Topics: Real Estate, Florida Gas v. Florida DOT, Energy Law, Commercial Law

Civil Trial Begins in Case of Fatal Stabbing at Apartment

Posted by msch on Jan 25, 2011 11:32:00 AM

Charlene Amrhein was murdered by 20-year old Solim Kollissiba while in a common area of her apartment complex, the Charleston Club Apartments, in Sanford, Florida.

Read More

Topics: Premises Liability, Negligence, Real Estate, Amrhein v. Concord Management

Real Estate Broker Recovers $1.5M Commission

Posted by msch on Jan 21, 2011 11:37:00 AM

Resort Properties v. Cherry Investment involved a claim by real estate broker David Atwell's sole proprietorship, Resort Properties, for a commission from the buyer of a Las Vegas resort hotel, Richard Alter and his company Financial Capital Investment.

Read More

Topics: Real Estate

Tenants Win in Pierre v. Cox Oakland Rent Control Trial

Posted by msch on Aug 12, 2010 11:20:00 AM

UPDATE (April 12, 2011): 
On December 16, 2010, the Court entered Judgment in this case in favor of Plaintiffs in the amount of $538,963.98.  This is three times the jury verdict, and reflects the provision in Measure EE which requires that a tenant recover treble damages for all harms caused by a landlord’s knowing or reckless violation of the Ordinance.  The jury specifically found that the defendant had wrongfully endeavored to recover each Plaintiff’s unit, and that he did so “in knowing violation of Ordinance.”

On February 18, 2011, the Court awarded to Plaintiffs an additional $1,052,402.00 for attorneys fees in connection with the case, under provisions in Measure EE which provide for attorney fees to prevailing litigants.  Additional motions requesting fees and costs are still pending, and Plaintiffs expect to recover about an additional $70,000 pursuant to those motions. 

Read More

Topics: Real Estate, Pierre v. Cox