Stock image.
Decatur, GA—An Atlanta-area obstetrician was cleared of responsibility last week for the childbirth-related shoulder injury that has left a girl without the use of her right arm. Cantrell v. Moore, 13A49232.
Posted by Arlin Crisco on Sep 1, 2017 7:25:21 PM
Stock image.
Decatur, GA—An Atlanta-area obstetrician was cleared of responsibility last week for the childbirth-related shoulder injury that has left a girl without the use of her right arm. Cantrell v. Moore, 13A49232.
Topics: Medical Malpractice, Georgia, Cantrell v. Moore
Posted by Arlin Crisco on Aug 29, 2017 11:59:21 PM
Stock image.
Decatur, GA—Jurors awarded a total of $3.5 million earlier this month to a pair of Georgia women shot outside a Stone Mountain-area nightclub.Canaday v. Jay’s Place Sports Bar & Lounge, Inc., 13-A47164-3, Johnson v. Jay’s Place Sports Bar & Lounge, Inc., 13-A-47165-3.
Topics: Premises Liability, Georgia, Canaday v. Jay's Place
Posted by Arlin Crisco on Aug 20, 2017 10:35:54 PM
Scott Bailey delivers his closing argument at trial of Dr. Arezou Fatemi. Jurors cleared Fatemi of liability for the death of Tom Cox, who suffered a heart attack days after visiting the doctor.
Atlanta—Jurors Wednesday cleared a physician of responsibility for the heart attack-related death of a long-time Turner Broadcasting sports director. Cox v. Fatemi, et al., 15EV001192.
Topics: Medical Malpractice, Georgia, Cox v. Fatemi
Posted by Arlin Crisco on Aug 10, 2017 11:30:25 PM
Wayne Grant delivers his opening statement at trial against Dr. Arezou Fatemi, accused of negligence that led to the death of Tom Cox.
Atlanta—Attorneys Tuesday debated whether an Atlanta-area doctor was responsible for the heart attack-related death of a longtime Turner Broadcasting sports director, as trial opened against the physician. Cox v. Fatemi, et al., 15EV001192.
Topics: Medical Malpractice, Georgia, Cox v. Fatemi
Posted by Courtroom View Network on Aug 4, 2017 7:38:30 AM
In mild traumatic brain injury cases, jurors may not be able to see the outward symptoms of a plaintiff's brain damage immediately. Because of that, it’s critical for a plaintiff’s attorney to lay the groundwork for a significant damage request by conveying the severity of the injury in the first moments of an opening statement. In Wicker v. American Family Insurance, Cash, Krugler & Fredericks’ Alwyn Fredericks combined visual aids and clear analogies during his opening to set up a seven-figure verdict in his client’s 2015 trial.
Topics: Court Video, Georgia, Transportation, Wicker v. American Family Insurance, Traumatic Brain Injury