During Tuesday’s opening statements, plaintiff attorney Greg Dovel of Dovel & Luner presented substantially different arguments than plaintiff attorneys in prior Roundup trials (many also recorded by CVN), with much more focus given to the underlying design and testing of glyphosate, the primary chemical Roundup is based on.
Dovel argued the basic design of the chemical compound should have raised red flags about possible health risks, but he accused Monsanto of skipping that process.
"Monsanto did not adequately test Roundup," Dovel told the jury, according to CVN’s webcast of the proceedings. “To this day, they’ve never done all the testing they've needed to do."
Addressing an issue that will be central to the trial, Dovel urged jurors to set aside the EPA finding that underpinned the Durnell ruling, arguing the agency’s determination glyphosate is safe and doesn't require cancer warning labels was based on incomplete and out-of-date science.
"EPA approval of Roundup doesn’t mean that it is safe," Dovel insisted.
Defense attorney Paul Boehm of Sidley Austin urged jurors to do the opposite, suggesting the EPA’s findings were backed up by decades of safety reviews and affirmed by other regulatory bodies around the world.
Boehm argued those findings alone undercut the current design defect claims, since it would have been impossible for a supposedly defectively designed and dangerous chemical to withstand such sustained scrutiny from regulators and not be pulled from the market.

CVN screenshot of defense attorney Paul Boehm delivering his opening statement
The jury’s verdict will likely not be the final word on how or even if Roundup and glyphosate lawsuits can proceed after the Durnell ruling. Monsanto maintains the current design-defect claims are also pre-empted under the ruling, with any eventual verdict guaranteed for appellate review in both state and federal court.
In the meantime, many eyes in the product liability and mass tort world will be on Judge May’s courtroom, where the trial is slated to take roughly four to five weeks to complete. CVN’s live and on-demand gavel-to-gavel coverage will continue for the duration of the proceedings.
The case is captioned Theresa Aretino, et al. v. Monsanto Company, case number 20SL-CC03676 in Missouri’s 21st Judicial Circuit.
Email David Siegel at dsiegel@cvn.com



