Subscribe-to-CVN-Blog-Graphic-small.png

Jury Awards Nothing to Smoker's Widow in Trial Against RJR, Despite Finding Cigarettes Caused Smoker's Death

Posted by Arlin Crisco on Apr 27, 2017 4:17:22 PM

Shadd-verdict.png

Randall Bassett delivers his closing argument on behalf of R.J. reynolds, accused of responsibility for the laryngeal cancer and eventual death of Ralph Shadd.


West Palm Beach, FL—Jurors this week found a Florida smoker's cancer and death were caused by R.J. Reynolds cigarettes, but shut out the smoker’s widow on her claim for damages against the tobacco company. Shadd v. R.J. Reynolds, 2008-CA-038631.

The 15th Circuit Court jury in Palm Beach County awarded nothing to Doris Shadd, despite finding her husband Ralph suffered from nicotine addiction that fueled his half-century smoking habit and ultimately led to his death in 2007.

New Call-to-action

The decision initially prompted Shadd’s legal team to claim the verdict was fatally inconsistent. However, after a recess, Shadd’s attorneys dropped their objection to the verdict, contending any problems with the decision were properly addressed on a post-verdict motion for additur.

Ralph Shadd, a WWII Army Air Corps veteran smoked more than a pack of cigarettes a day for over 50 years, ultimately quitting in 1996 after he was diagnosed with laryngeal cancer. He was later diagnosed with lung cancer and died in 2007 at 81.

Doris Shadd claims Reynolds’ participation in a decades-long scheme to hide the dangers of smoking ultimately led to her husband’s nicotine addiction, cancer, and death.

The case is one of thousands of Florida’s Engle progeny lawsuits against the nation’s tobacco companies. They stem from a 2006 Florida Supreme Court decision decertifying Engle v. Liggett Group Inc., a class-action tobacco suit originally filed in 1994. Although the state’s supreme court ruled that Engle-progeny cases must be tried individually, it found plaintiffs could rely on certain jury findings in the original case, including the determination that tobacco companies had placed a dangerous, addictive product on the market and had conspired to hide the dangers of smoking through much of the 20th century.

In order to be entitled to those findings, however, each Engle progeny plaintiff must prove the smoker at the heart of their case suffered from nicotine addiction that led to a specific smoking-related disease.

Monday’s verdict followed a 13-day trial centering on responsibility for Shadd’s cancer. During last Friday’s closing arguments, Searcy Denney’s Laurie Briggs highlighted Reynolds’ participation in a multi-pronged scheme to hide the dangers of smoking, including marketing light and low-tar cigarettes as safe smoking alternatives and publicly denying the addictive nature of nicotine. “They knew it, they lied about it, and that was their business plan,” Briggs said.

Briggs, who reminded jurors of expert testimony concluding Shadd was a nicotine addict, said Shadd’s time spent with a cigarette amounted to between 45 and 50 days out of each year he smoked. “Fifty days out of a 365-day calendar,” Briggs said. “People don’t do that unless they’re addicted to the nicotine in cigarettes.”

But the defense contended Shadd was to blame for damage his smoking may have caused. During last week’s closings, King & Spalding’s Randall Bassett argued Shadd never made a concerted effort to quit before he turned 50, which Bassett contended could have reduced Shadd’s smoking-related cancer risk by 90%. “Mr. Shadd was responsible for his own lung cancer and death based on his own decisions about smoking and quitting,” Bassett said.  

Bassett also reminded jurors Shadd outlived his statistical life expectancy, given his health problems, including diabetes, that were unrelated to his smoking. “Patients with diabetes that is long-term have a life expectancy that is 10 years less than the average,” Bassett said. “And that was Mr. Shadd.”

Beyond their rejection of any damage award, jurors found Reynolds only 5% responsible for Shadd’s cancer, apportioning the remainder to Shadd himself.

Searcy Denney’s John Scarola, representing Doris Shadd, had requested at least $1 million in compensatory damages, plus potential punitives, in last week’s closings.

This isn’t the first time Reynolds has escaped liability for damages, despite a finding of responsibility for a smoker’s cancer. In 2014, Broward County jurors found George Banks was an Engle class member and apportioned 15% of responsibility for Banks’ esophageal cancer to the tobacco company, but rejected any damage award to his family. Last year, the state’s 4th District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

Email Arlin Crisco at acrisco@cvn.com.

Related Information

Doris Shadd is represented by Searcy Denney Scarola Barhnhart & Shipley’s John Scarola, Laurie Briggs, and T. Hardee Bass.

R.J. Reynolds is represented by King & Spalding’s Randall Bassett, Philip Green, and Harold Franklin.

Watch the trial on demand. 

Not a subscriber?

 

Learn about CVN's unrivaled tobacco litigation library. 

Topics: Shadd v. R.J. Reynolds, Florida, tobacco, Engle Progeny, Products Liability